Relative dose rates from the three most common NORMs

Discussions about radiation-related science
Post Reply
User avatar
ColoRad-o
Posts: 56
Joined: 18 Oct 2019, 08:27
Location: Colorado, USA
Contact:

Relative dose rates from the three most common NORMs

Post by ColoRad-o » 10 Jul 2024, 07:47

As y'all know, aerial gamma surveys can map out soil concentrations of 232Th and 238U (and their many decay daughters), plus 40K. And of course, so can we. As a follow-up to some of my recent postings, I'm enclosing the relative dose rates (as a function of gamma energy) for these three. These should be regarded as semi-quantitative, since they depend on efficiency data for a 2"x2" NaI:Tl detector which undoubtedly differs in detail from the one I have. (I have only a small carton of KCl salt substitute as a 40K source, so had to subtract background from its spectrum, hence the noise.). Not sure who might find these useful.
Attachments
K40-Th232-U238-DoseVsEnergy.png
K40-Th232-U238-DoseVsEnergy.pdf
(836.12 KiB) Downloaded 320 times
D. M. Wood, retired physics professor
Arvada, Colorado (USA)
SAFECAST member (bGeigie Nano)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests